老人与海圣地亚哥英文介绍300词
Santiago is a Hemingway works in the vivid image of the fisherman. Santiago 84 days to have gained nothing, his tenacity and hard work, ushered in the eighty-fifth day of hope Dawn, ushered in the eighty-fifth days of sunshine. The eighty-fifth day, the old man out. In the vast sea of his persistence finally paid off: a marlin hooked.
The next four days, is the old man and the big marlin. The cold water is not afraid, not afraid of. He used his wisdom, to beat the big marlin victory.
After trying again and again, the old man finally beat the big marlin, he dared to challenge the failure. The old man and the sea's story tells us, just do not give up, one day you will be successful!
（中文翻译）
桑提亚哥是一个在海明威笔下生动形象的渔夫。桑提亚哥84天出海一无所获，他的顽强与拼搏，迎来了第85天充满希望的黎明，又迎来了第85天灿烂的阳光。第85天，老人出海了。在茫茫大海中他的坚持终于得到回报：一条大马林鱼上钩了。
接下来的四天，便是老人与大马林鱼的较量。寒风刺骨不怕，缺水也不怕。他运用自己的智慧，战胜了大马林鱼迎来了胜利。
经过一次又一次的尝试，老人终于战胜了大马林鱼，他敢于向失败挑战。老人与海的故事告诉我们，只要不放弃，总有一天你也会成功!
本文来自：读书人网()原文链接：data/20130410/1128497.html
评价老人与海里的老人有什么品质用英文
The Old Man and the Sea served to reinvigorate Hemingway's
literary reputation and prompted a reexamination of his entire body of
work. The novella was initially received with much popularity; it
restored many readers' confidence in Hemingway's capability as an
author. Its publisher, Scribner's, on an early dust jacket, called the
novella a new classic, and many critics favorably compared it with
such works as William Faulkner's The Bear and Herman Melville's
Moby-Dick.
Following such acclaim, however, a school of critics
emerged that interpreted the novella as a disappointing minor work. For
example, critic Philip Young provided an admiring review in 1952, just
following The Old Man and the Sea's publication, in which he stated that
it was the book in which Hemingway said the finest single thing he
ever had to say as well as he could ever hope to say it. However, in
1966, Young claimed that the failed novel too often went way out.
These self-contradictory views show that critical reaction ranged from
adoration of the book's mythical, pseudo-religious intonations to
flippant dismissal as pure fakery. The latter is founded in the notion
that Hemingway, once a devoted student of realism, failed in his
depiction of Santiago as a supernatural, clairvoyant impossibility.
Joseph
Waldmeir's essay entitled Confiteor Hominem: Ernest Hemingway's
Religion of Man is one of the most famed favorable critical readings of
the novella—and one which has defined analytical considerations since.
Perhaps the most memorable claim therein is Waldmeir's answer to the
rhetorical question,
- 相关评论
- 我要评论
-